If you are unable to create a new account, please email support@bspsoftware.com

 

News:

MetaManager - Administrative Tools for IBM Cognos
Pricing starting at $2,100
Download Now    Learn More

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Issue is resolved after I exchanged the Certificate of servers with each other. Thank You.
#2
Hi Team,

I have installed Cognos Analytics 12.0.4 all components on two separate machines/servers. I have a single DB2 machine as content database.
1. cognosprod01 - primary
2. cognosprod02 - secondary

I have updated the two content manager URIs in the environment configuration.
1. https://cognosprod01:9300/p2pd/servlet
2. https://cognosprod02:9300/p2pd/servlet

I have updated the dispatcher URIs for gateways also as below.
1. https://cognosprod01:9300/bi/v1/disp
2. https://cognosprod02:9300/bi/v1/disp

When I'm starting the cognos services on both servers. Only prod01 is getting started properly. prod02 server get stuck at CM-REQ-2378 A request was received to start the negotiation process to determine which content manager instance should become active.

as of now each server has its own entry in Gateway URI field.

Content DB server is reachable from both server.

Cognos services start successfully on the server where I start them first, the second one goes into this error.

Do I need to configure HTTP server before I start the services on both cognos server and update the Gateway URI. So that cognos services comes up properly on each server?

OR

Do I need to exchange keys between these servers, so that they can communicate with each other. I'm using TLS1.2, HTTPS and Third Party Certificate Authority.

Or this error is because of something else?

Kindly guide me, if I need to so some other configuration.

Will follow this link to configure HTTP server (https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cognos-analytics/12.0.x?topic=server-configuring-http-v9)
#3
Report Studio / Re: Using images stored in BL...
Last post by Claudecob - Today at 03:57:32 AM
MuscPharm: <a href=" https://muscpharm.xyz/# ">Musc Pharm</a> - MuscPharm
#4
Report Studio / Re: Using images stored in BL...
Last post by MuscphCex - Yesterday at 02:27:49 PM
legitimate online pharmacy usa https://muscpharm.com/# MuscPharm
#5
COGNOS PowerPlay / order cheap propecia without p...
Last post by JesusRiX - 27 Nov 2025 08:23:30 PM
BSW Finasteride: <a href=" https://bswfinasteride.com/# ">BswFinasteride</a> - buy propecia prices
#6
Современная агентство по написанию текстов предлагает услугах профессионального копирайтинга.
Наши специалисты пишем уникальные тексты для сайтов для компаний.
Любой материал адаптируется под SEO, чтобы обеспечить роста позиций в поиске.
Хотите заказать написание контента с гарантией качества.
Оставьте заявку https://1url.cz/IJS6T, и мы поможем SEO-оптимизированные статьи для вашего бизнеса.
#7
Administration and Security / Re: COGIPF_PARAMETERS.COGIPF_P...
Last post by dougp - 25 Nov 2025 11:25:19 AM
By "which parameters", do you mean what you see listed as a parameter in Reporting?  The COGIPF_PARAMETER table in the audit database contains what Cognos defines as a parameter.  There are many types.  You're looking for

COGIPF_PARAMETER_NAME = 'parameterValues'

Then you'll need to parse the XML.
#8
Report Studio / Re: How can I config the list ...
Last post by Starjer - 25 Nov 2025 07:58:08 AM
 
I see a lot of talk about general strategies, but what about specific odds? I've been comparing a few, and the lines on
 
https://wplaydescargar.co/
 
seem consistently better, at least for football. Does anyone else have a similar observation, or am I missing something?
#9
Report Studio / Re: [SOLVED] Detail filter exc...
Last post by Juanjer - 24 Nov 2025 08:48:33 AM
 
I see a lot of talk about general strategies, but what about specific odds? I've been comparing a few, and the lines on
 
https://wplaydescargar.co/
 
seem consistently better, at least for football. Does anyone else have a similar observation, or am I missing something?
#10
I'm using Cognos 12. And yeah, I didn't find how to run a report in documentations.. that was suggested by chatgpt; but it didn't work.