If you are unable to create a new account, please email support@bspsoftware.com

 

News:

MetaManager - Administrative Tools for IBM Cognos
Pricing starting at $2,100
Download Now    Learn More

Main Menu

unable to see ET_xxxx tables in planning data marts

Started by babu babu, 27 Sep 2011 06:15:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

babu babu

Hi,

I have published the application into oracle but i can see only sy_,cy_,it_ tables I want to see the et_ tables to integrate with BI.Please help me regarding this.

Thanks,
Anand.

ericlfg

Hi Anand,

Where are you publishing, in Analyst or the Contributor Admin Console (CAC)?  Can I assume that you're using the Table layout method and that you're using the default publish container that you created?

What version of Planning are you using?

babu babu

Hi Eric,

I am using cognos8.1.I am publishing the data from CAC table only layout elist items i have selected all planner  and in options i have selected include user annotations and audit annotations i am getting all the dlist items but et_  tables are not coming.

Thanks,
Anand.

StuartS

Are any of your D-Cubes flagged as planner only in Contributor Administration? I havent tried changing, but it may be the source of your problem?

ericlfg

I just tested switching a cube that I know publishes from the go_Capex sample application to Planner only and publishing, the et_ table is created as expected.  I, however, did do this in 10.1 as I don't have my hands on an 8.1 environment at the moment.

Still, Anand, take a look at what Stuart suggested. 

If that still doesn't work, then I'm a little confused -- the et_ table is a base function of either the view or table layout publish options.  To not have an ET_ table leads me to believe that you have a configuration problem.

What is the name of the cube you are trying to publish? 

babu babu

Hi,

Something problem in the existing data container.I have created new container with diff name and published the application which is working fine.Thanks Eric an stuart for your response.

Thanks,
Anand.