If you are unable to create a new account, please email support@bspsoftware.com

 

News:

MetaManager - Administrative Tools for IBM Cognos
Pricing starting at $2,100
Download Now    Learn More

Main Menu

dimensional modelling

Started by tupac_rd, 29 Jul 2010 02:27:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tupac_rd

Hi Gurus,

Is there a best practices document somewhere for creating a clean dimensional model in FM or otherwise from a relational model which has all kind of crazy joins, loops etc., I want to create more of a star schema kind of model..

Thanks
2pac

Evorus

2pac,

I can only go off what we've created, based on Dimensionally Modeled Data not a relational Database.
I will attempt to put this into a relational metadata perspective.

Within FM we have created 4 namespaces under the current project.

The Namespaces are as follows

Physical Metadata
This would be you relational metadata, I would also have a sub folder in here used to store your Query Subjects (Dimension and Facts etc.)
All your links are defined within this level


Consolidation View
This area is a copy of Physical Metadata you would like (The dimensions and facts etc)
There are no Joins within this level.
No surrogate keys should be brought accross

Dimensions
Utilise this level to create your Dimensional Higherarchy
Facts should be brought through to this level as well.

Business View
Create 2 folders one which contains shortcuts to your Analysis Dimensions and Measures (From the Namespace above)
And a Reporting folder which contains shortcuts to the Dimensions and Measures from the Consolidation View.

With this set up you will then have a set of Analysis Studio models and a Report Studio Models.


I would like to know if anyone else has a similar approach

E

funkigreendog


tupac_rd

Thankyou very much. I will definitely look through them.

MFGF

Quote from: Evorus on 30 Jul 2010 08:40:52 AM
2pac,

I can only go off what we've created, based on Dimensionally Modeled Data not a relational Database.
I will attempt to put this into a relational metadata perspective.

Within FM we have created 4 namespaces under the current project.

The Namespaces are as follows

Physical Metadata
This would be you relational metadata, I would also have a sub folder in here used to store your Query Subjects (Dimension and Facts etc.)
All your links are defined within this level


Consolidation View
This area is a copy of Physical Metadata you would like (The dimensions and facts etc)
There are no Joins within this level.
No surrogate keys should be brought accross

Dimensions
Utilise this level to create your Dimensional Higherarchy
Facts should be brought through to this level as well.

Business View
Create 2 folders one which contains shortcuts to your Analysis Dimensions and Measures (From the Namespace above)
And a Reporting folder which contains shortcuts to the Dimensions and Measures from the Consolidation View.

With this set up you will then have a set of Analysis Studio models and a Report Studio Models.


I would like to know if anyone else has a similar approach

E

Pretty much exactly how I'd do it too! :)
Meep!